Project > Hortimed > Tasks
Structure of the work plans
The proposed project is broken down into four logical components whose further subdivision into “tasks” is outlined in the table below ("Time flow" part).
The first work package (WP1) is a review of present situation, both resources and expected requirements, in the most important horticultural areas in the Med. The estimate of the expected requirements will be coupled to the development of realistic fertigation recipes for the major horticultural crops.
The second work package
(WP2) will consider greenhouse management (climate and irrigation) strategies
that make it possible to mitigate the negative effect of low-quality irrigation
water, once this effect (yield response to salinity) is quantified for the most
important crops.
Work package three (WP3)
will give structure to existing information on water saving techniques and
installations (such as rain-harvesting, use and upgrade of waste water; new
irrigation techniques; new crops and crop combinations) and link their
efficiency to climate and other regional factors. We will determine a strategy
for the management at farm level of multiple-quality water-resources.
Work package four (WP4)
will provide a tool for irrigation and fertigation management. An analysis of
expected effects on yield quantity and quality will be translated into a
decision support system (DSS) for growers. The Decision Support System will
contain simulation modules of the relevant processes at farm level (WP2 and
WP3). It will be able to perform a multi-objective optimisation, suggesting a
ranking of strategies for the best allocation of restrictions to different
farming structures with the aim of maximising rewards. The results of the
previous work packages will be used for estimating economical costs of
restrictions and feasibility of rewards.
WP1 develops the classical approach to deal with fresh water shortage by studying means to improve water use efficiency by adjusting application to need. The first step establishes water and nutrient demand as a function of production targets. The method of investigation to achieve this result is through chemical analysis of plants producing high yields under optimum nutrient supply. The next step involves development of management procedures to match water and nutrient delivery with the desired level of plant uptake. The purpose of this task stems from the long warm and sunny season in the Mediterranean region. As optimum growing conditions under intensive cropping imply a leaching fraction to evacuate residual solutes from the growing medium, a task dealing with environmental is an essential part of the project.
The second WP develops ways to handle the negative effects of saline water. As toxic and osmotic processes cause the stress due to saline irrigation, it considers the solute balance in the plant and in the root growth medium to find the causality of the leading to response functions. This approach provides a scientific platform for the investigation of the climate management procedures and for the applications.
In contrast with the physiological, chemical and physical investigation inWP1 and WP2, WP3 engages direct with practical agronomic-engineering on-farm operations, which affect the exposure of plants to solutes. It provides the means to implement rapidly current knowledge and to adjust growing methods to new findings.
While WP1 and WP2 develop bits and pieces of new information about ways to deal with low quality water, WP4 prepares the framework for integrating partial knowledge into applications. It will also maintain and improve the communication channel between newly acquired information and the growers.
|
WP |
Partners |
Months after kick-off |
||||||
|
Task |
|
6 |
12 |
18 |
24 |
30 |
36 |
42 |
|
WP0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WP1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T1.1 |
3,8,1,2,4,5,7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T1.2 |
2,3,8,1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WP2 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T2.1 |
7,2,4,5,6,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T2.2 |
4,5,1,3,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T2.3 |
7,,4,,6,7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WP3 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T3.1 |
6,1,2,3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T3.2 |
6,4,5,7,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T3.3 |
7,2,3,5,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WP4 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T4.1 |
1,2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T4.2 |
1,3,5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T4.3 |
8 and all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T4.4 |
4 and all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reports |
|
1st year |
|
2nd year |
|
3rd year |
Final |
|
|
Deliverables |
|
1,3,7,11 |
|
6,8 |
15,16 |
2,4,5,9,10 |
12,13,14 |
|
1.
A project detailed definition report will
provide exact expectations from software packages (model demo), and detailed
design of experiments
2.
Deliver STATE OF THE ART (WP1) on situation
assessment (a Mediterranean mapping depicting the problem and possible
solutions) and a wealth of recipes, which shall be revised as “adaptive
recipes”, that is ion compensation for non-pure water sources. These later
“adaptive” recipes will be the merging of WP1 and WP2, at the end of the
project.
3.
Final deliverables as described in part 1.
|
Time
(months) |
Milestone |
Deliverables |
|
+1 |
Kick-off Meeting (contract date + 1) |
Selection of subject
crops Definition of
information exchange means Selection of software
environment for the DSS |
|
+6 |
Environmental impact
panel Meeting |
Identification of “monitorable” growers Review of monitoring
methods |
|
+13 |
1st
Progress Meeting |
Environmental impact
Report Yield response to
salinity Report Compilation of
water-saving techniques and prices |
|
+18 |
Dissemination panel Meeting 1 |
Selection of format
for “rules of thumb” Identification of
target areas Planning of courses
and workshop |
|
+24 |
2nd
Progress Meeting |
Salt accumulation
model report Blueprint for
management of multiple sources Control algorithm for
greenhouse fertigation |
|
+30 |
1st
Dissemination workshop |
Handbook
for short courses Evaluation report |
|
+36 |
3rd
Progress Meeting |
Fertigation recipes
book Blue-print for climate
control Report on analysis of
crop combinations |
|
+36¾42 |
Short courses,
seminars |
Evaluation report |
|
+42 |
Final Presentation |
DSS (executable) Handbook of the DSS
software Draft final report |