![[Help]](United States Patent 4,618,861.files/help.gif)

![[Add to Shopping Cart]](United States Patent 4,618,861.files/order.gif)
United States Patent |
4,618,861 |
Gettens , et al. |
October 21, 1986 |
Passive activity monitor for livestock
Abstract
An estrus detection system using a transponder mounted to an animal and
including a motion sensor. The motion sensor produces a series of pulses as a
function of movement. A counting circuit is energized by the sensor. A storage
circuit retains the count together with an identification code unique to the
animal. The transponder is interrogated to receive data and such is processed to
determine estrus.
Inventors: |
Gettens; John W. (Ithaca, NY);
Sigrimis; Nick A. (Halandri, GR); Scott; Norman R. (Ithaca,
NY) |
Assignee: |
Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.
(Ithaca, NY) |
Appl. No.: |
713946 |
Filed: |
March 20, 1985 |
Current U.S. Class: |
340/10.41; 119/51.02;
128/903; 340/573.3; 340/870.38 |
Intern'l Class: |
H04Q 009/00 |
Field of Search: |
340/825.54,870.38,573,505 128/419
N,774,782,903 119/51 R 377/27 |
References Cited [Referenced
By]
U.S. Patent Documents
4232686 |
Nov., 1980 |
Kammlade, Jr. |
340/573. |
4237900 |
Dec., 1980 |
Schulman et al. |
128/903. |
4333072 |
Jun., 1982 |
Beigel |
340/825. |
4510495 |
Apr., 1985 |
Sigrimus et al. |
340/825. |
Primary
Examiner: Yusko; Donald J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sughrue,
Mion, Zinn, Macpeak and Seas
Claims
Having described our invention, we claim:
1. A detection system
for an animal comprising:
a transponder mounted to the animal, said
transponder including transducer means responsive to movement of the animal to
generate a series of electrical pulses, first circuit means receiving said
electrical pulses and generating a count indication of animal movement, second
circuit means receiving said electrical pulses and storing electrical energy for
driving said first circuit means, and means for storing said count together with
an identification code unique to said animal,
means for interrogating
said transponder to receive data therefrom; and
process means for
receiving data from said interrogator means.
2. The detection system of
claim 1 wherein said transducer means comprises a piezoelectric member mounted
on a base and a suspended mass positioned to move and strike said piezoelectric
member in response to movement of said animal.
3. The detection system
of claim 2 further comprising an insulator placed on said piezoelectric member
to contact said mass and transfer the force of striking by said mass to said
piezoelectric member.
4. The detection system of claim 1 wherein said
first circuit means comprises a binary counter receiving pulses from transducer
and generating a count value and memory means for said count value.
5.
The detection system of claim 4 further comprising a low-pass filter interposed
between said transducer and said counter.
6. The detection system of
claim 1 wherein said second circuit means comprises rectifier means receiving
said electrical pulses and producing a rectified output and capacitor means for
storing said rectified output.
7. The detection system of claim 6
wherein said first circuit means is coupled to said capacitor and is powered
thereby.
8. The detection system of claim 1 wherein said transponder
receives an input burst signal at a given frequency from an external source,
said transponder further comprising:
antenna circuit means storing
unregulated power from said received input burst signal, means receiving said
unregulated power and producing clock pulses of variable period; means for
encoding said stored count and said identification code; and modulator means
receiving encoded identification and count data from said encode means and
producing a modulated signal to said antenna circuit means, wherein said antenna
circuit means utilizes said stored power to transmit a coded signal at said
frequency.
9. The detection system of claim 8 wherein said means for
storing said count together with an identification code comprises a code
register programmed and storing said identification code and storing count data
from said first circuit means and, said means for encoding receiving said
identification code and said stored count from said code register and shaping it
into a twin binary signal.
10. The detection system of claim 9 wherein
said twin binary signal comprises a marker portion of a predetermined number of
bits, an activity portion of a predetermined number of bits and an
identification portion of a predetermined number of bits.
11. The
detection system of claim 8 wherein said means producing clock pulses produces
clock pulses having a period that varies as a function of said unregulated
power.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a passive
system for the identification of remote movable objects together with a
capability of storing and transmitting information uniquely associated with that
object. This invention is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 406,471,
filed Aug. 9, 1982, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,510,495 and entitled "Remote Passive
Identification System" now U.S. Pat. No. 4,510,495.
This invention
utilizes the identification and transmission aspects of that co-pending
application and enhances the system by providing for data collection and storage
of parameters unique to the identified object. As in the case of U.S. Pat. No.
4,510,495, this invention has particular utility in livestock management.
Advances in microelectronics have been applied to systems employing
coded transponders associated with an object to be identified and engergized by
interrogator burst pulses, such that a transmission of coded information signals
unique to the object carrying the transponder is generated. Such techniques,
when pursued in the dairy industry, allow for efficient herd management by
identifying each animal. For example, with cows, once identity has been
established, additional data associated with that individual cow may be
collected and appropriate action taken. Herd management, therefore, requires in
the first instance the identification of the animal such that monitoring of
health, reproductive status, allocation and distribution of feed and production
(i.e., milk in the case of cows) can all be monitored.
In the context of
dairy herds, estrus detection is an important aspect of herd management. Estrus
detection rates have a direct influence on the profitability of the herd as a
function of calving interval. The optimum calving interval is approximately
twelve months. A longer interval results in decreased milk production per cow
per day and fewer calves. At present there exists no reliable automated
technique of estrus detection on dairy farms. Manual, visual observation and
pedometers are typical of attempts based on increased activity of the animal to
detect estrus. Those techniques are accurate provided the farmer has sufficient
time for observation of the animals. It has been estimated that the present
average estrus detection rate is in the range of 40-60%. Given the clear
dependency of herd profitability on this detection rate, a need exists for a
system employing a reliable estrus detection technique which can be used in the
context of contemporary herd management systems.
Reference is made to
U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,758. The animal identification and estrus detection system,
described therein, employs an activity sensor/recorder, a transponder, an
interrogator and an information processing unit. The motion sensor is a mercury
switch/battery combination. Motion by the animal wearing the sensor causes the
mercury switch to close, which produces a voltage pulse incrementing a binary
counter. The sensor defined in U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,758 outputs a voltage pulse
of constant amplitude whenever the switch is opened and closed. This constant
amplitude pulse is generated independent of force and velocity of motion
provided the force is sufficient to close the mercury switch. Consequently, the
system cannot detect between various types of motion.
A major
disadvantage of the U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,758 system is that it requires a power
supply for the sensor and counter. That is, the device carried by the animal is
an active device necessitating the use of a battery to power both a sensor and
the counter. The requirement of a battery is of considerable importance in
application of such devices to animals. For example, a battery operated device
must be removed periodically to change batteries which is a potentially arduous
task in large herds. The requirement for a battery adds considerable weight and
cost to the individual devices. Consequently, a system which eliminates a
battery represents an important improvement in this technology. A battery free
device may, for example, be implanted in the animal. Even if not implanted, it
may remain on the animal over the lifetime of the device or the animal without
maintenance.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Given the deficiencies of the
prior art, it is an object of this invention to define a system capable of
identification of an object and detection of dynamic characteristics unique to
that object.
Another object of this invention is to define a system
which employs a transponder for identifying each object together with an
activity monitor coupled to such an identification system.
A further
object of this invention is to define a system for herd management having the
capability of identifying each animal in a herd and monitoring activity of each
animal.
Yet another object of this invention is to define an estrus
detection system utilizing a passive transducer not requiring a battery or any
other depletable energy source.
These and other objects of this
invention are accomplished in an identification system employing passive
techniques of information storage and transmission. The system in its most basic
components comprises an activity monitor which is used to sense and record
motion of the object, typically an animal, under active management. Also carried
is a transponder for encoding such activity together with identification
information unique to that animal. At a stationary location, typically an
entrance to a barn or milking parlor, a transmitter/receiver is stationed to
interrogate the transponder and extract from it stored data relative to activity
and animal identification. A data processor is employed for conversion,
manipulation and storage of such activity and information retrieval. Such is
used to determine the onset of estrus by historically monitoring motion or
activity of the animal.
This invention will be described in greater
detail by referring to the attached drawings and the description of the
preferred embodiment which follows.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a remote passive identification system and
information processor in accordance with this invention;
FIG. 2 is a
block diagram of the system transponder and activity monitor which is carried by
the object to be identified;
FIG. 3A is a side view of the motion sensor
portion of the activity monitor;
FIG. 3B is a top view of a component of
that motion sensor;
FIG. 4 is a schematic circuit diagram of the
activity monitor in accordance with this invention;
FIG. 5 is an
illustration of the data format of the code word generated by the transducer;
FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of an activity monitor and transducer
carried by an animal; and
FIG. 7 is a graph of Average Activity Level
Profile for cows as a function of time.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
EMBODIMENT
This invention employs microelectronics in the realm of
agriculture and in particular, to automation in the context of dairy herd
management. Microelectronic technology, as applied by this invention, allows for
active monitoring of herd health, reproductive status, allocating and
distributing feed, and monitoring milk production. All of these facets of herd
management are directly related to productivity and ultimately profitability of
the operation. An essential area of automated dairy herd management is the
standing requirement that each animal in the herd be identified. Only when
identification is carried out may additional information concerning that animal
be properly used so that action, based on such information, can be taken. U.S.
Pat. No. 4,510,495, entitled "Remote Passive Identification System" now U.S.
Pat. No. 4,510,495 and commonly assigned with this application, discloses an
accurate and reliable identification system used in such dairy herd management.
The disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 4,510,495 is incorporated herein by reference
since the basic system aspects, vis-a-vis identification per se, are used in
this invention. This invention represents an improvement over that basic system,
while utilizing the same system architecture, provides additional capabilities
in terms of selective information storage and retrieval.
An important
aspect of this invention is the gathering of information for the detection of
estrus. The detection rates of estrus have a direct influence on herd
profitability which is dependent on calving interval. This invention allows for
automated accurate identification of estrus in individual animals, wherein at
present, detection rates are in the range of 40-60%.
The detection
system of this invention determines the onset of estrus by monitoring an
animal's motion or activity. In the case of cows, the daily activity of a cow in
the dairy herd varies only slightly on a day-to-day basis. Within the herd,
however, periods of estrus for an individual cow are signaled by a substantial
increase in activity over a non-estrus baseline level for that particular
animal. Consequently, by monitoring activity and establishing such baseline
data, the onset of estrus can be determined accurately. This invention,
therefore, operates to record activity of the animal so that periods of estrus
may be differentiated from non-estrus periods. While correlating estrus to
increased activity is known per se, techniques of information gathering germane
to individual cows in the context of a herd are not known.
Referring to
FIG. 1, the remote passive identification system employing a transponder and
activity monitor are depicted in block diagram format.
A power
transmitter 2 having an associated loop antenna 6 produces a plurality of RF
burst signals 4. As described in the co-pending application, an oscillating
field configuration is developed wherein the burst signals are received by the
transponder 8. This invention, as will be described herein, integrates an
activity monitor with the transponder.
As shown in FIG. 6, the entire
transponder/activity monitor is carried by the animal, such as a cow, around the
animal's neck wherein it is free to swing along any of the three principal axes,
such that motion of the animal is directly transmitted to the activity monitor.
Referring to FIG. 2, the combined transponder and activity monitor are
illustrated in functional blocks. The transponder portion of FIG. 2 corresponds
to the transponder illustrated in the same corresponding figure of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 406,471. The disclosure of that patent application is
expressly incorporated herein by reference for description of the operation of
that transponder.
In accordance with this invention, an activity monitor
80 is operably coupled to the transponder. In practice, such would be formed as
a single circuit, integrated on a common board or chip.
The activity
monitor 80 comprises a motion sensor generator 82 to be described in detail
relative to FIGS. 3 and 4. The motion sensor generator converts animal motion
into electrical energy in the form of voltage pulses. The sensor, therefore,
acts as a transducer to transform physical movement of the animal into pulses
which are used by the system in the first instance to determine activity.
Voltage pulses produced by the generator are filtered by low pass filter 84 to
attenuate the pulses produced by the motion sensor and eliminate transients or
pulses below a threshold value in the output voltage pulses of the generator 82.
The low pass filter output is delivered to a binary counter 86 which records the
number of voltage pulses. The buffer 88 acts as a gate between the powered
activity monitor 80 and the unpowered transponder 8.
The buffer 88
provides a high impedance load to the counter 86 outputs in either its powered
or unpowered states. Thus when the transponder is unpowered no data transfer
occurs because the buffer in unpowered and no data transfer to the register
occurs.
When the transponder is interrogated and therefore powered the
buffer is powered and the data is passed to the transponder registers for
transmission via the responder during the interrogation interval. The buffer is
necessary because a direct connection from the counter outputs to the shift
register inputs would load the counter outputs and drain the activity monitor
power supply.
A parallel output of the motion sensor generator 82 is a
series of voltage pulses which are converted via the power supply 90 to drive
the counter 86. Such is illustrated relative to FIG. 4.
FIG. 4 is a
schematic circuit diagram of the activity monitor 80 showing the essential
electrical components. The motion sensor/generator 82 is schematically
illustrated as a current source having its output coupled to the half wave
rectifier formed by diodes D.sub.1 and D.sub.2. The rectified output is
delivered to a capacitor C.sub.1 which serves as the power supply for the binary
counter 86.
Voltage pulses from the motion sensor/generator 82 are
clamped at a value above the capacitor voltage V.sub.c1, typically approximately
0.7 V. The excess charge is then stored in the capacitor C.sub.1 such that the
capacitor is continually charged by voltage pulses which are produced by the
motion sensor/generator 82.
Diode D.sub.1 of the half wave rectifier is
a low leakage type to reduce current consumption. Typically, leakage rates are
less than 1 pA current consumption at a reverse bias voltage of 5 V. Preferably,
the power supply capacitor C.sub.1 is a Tantalum type necessary to meet the
requirements of this system, that is small size, large capacitance and low
leakage (less than 10 pA current at 2.5 V).
The components of FIG. 4 may
preferably employ the following components/values: D.sub.2 -1N914; D.sub.1 PAD
1; R 1M .OMEGA.; C.sub.1 10 .mu.F; C.sub.2 5-150 pF. It is understood that such
values may be altered depending on the specific mode of implementation and
animal involved.
The low pass filter 84 is formed by the RC combination
of the resistor R and capacitor C.sub.2 shown in FIG. 4. The RC.sub.2 low pass
filter is used to adjust the sensitivity of the device. Low magnitude pulses may
be attenuated if desired so that they are not recorded by the binary counter.
Such a feature is potentially advantageous in the detection of estrus.
As illustrated in FIG. 4, the binary counter continually increments
until it reaches capacity, at which time it automatically resets at 0 and again
commences counting. The binary counter multi-bit output is delivered to the
buffer 88. The counter may be a MC 14020 14-stage Ripple Carry Binary Counter
(Motorola) and the buffer 88 may be a MC 14050 HEX Non-Inverting Buffer
(Motorola). Both devices are commercially available and the choice of a
particular product is within the level of ordinary skill.
Referring to
FIG. 3, a side view of the motion sensor is depicted with FIG. 3A illustrating
the hammer component.
The sensor comprises a beam of piezoelectric
material 30 which is supported at both ends by a holding clip 32. The
piezoelectric material may be Lead Zirconate Titanate Bimorph, Venitron, PZT-5H
(Vernitron Piezoelectric Bedford OH). An epoxy coated lead hammer 34 is
positioned at the center portion of the beam. As illustrated in FIG. 3B, the
lead hammer comprises a mass which is suspended by spring steel wires 36, the
wires being suitably coupled to the housing at points 38 to allow the hammer to
swing freely. Animal motion, therefore, causes the hammer to move and strike the
beam which in turn generates a potential difference (voltage pulses) between
outer plates of the piezoelectric material. By this technique, mechanical energy
caused by cow motion is transformed into electrical energy.
As shown in
FIG. 3A, a mylar pad 40 is used to absorb the blows caused by the lead hammer
34, yet, at the same time, transmit force to the PZT-5H bimorph material. An
epoxy pad may be used on top of the mylar insulator to directly absorb blows
from the hammer 34. A stop 44 is provided to prevent excessive deformation of
the bimorp. An adhesive, typically RTV may be used to mount the entire assembly
onto a substrate 46. The entire unit is formed as one housing integral with the
transponder and counter circuitry.
When the animal carrying the activity
monitor/transducer passes into the range of an interrogation
transmitter/receiver, the power supply in the transponder activates the buffer
88 such that the output from the binary counter 86 is coupled to the transponder
encoder through the bit register. Thus, activity information is encoded as a
portion of the transponder code word. This code word is shown in FIG. 5 as
comprising three segments, a marker segment, an activity segment and an
identification segment.
Using the techniques described in the co-pending
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 406,471, a transponder return signal is
modulated by a twinned binary form of the code word. The return signal is
coupled to the receiver via a loop antenna 12.
In accordance with this
invention, the output of the receiver 14 is transferred to a data processing
unit 20. That processor reads the code word and may either display the
identification of the animal and activity information on a real time basis or
transfer data to some other display device such as printer monitor or the like.
The processor 20 also stores activity data relative to each animal under
management who performs those calculations necessary to signal periods of
estrus. While the specific programming for the processor 20 to determine the
onset of estrus is not set forth herein, such is well known in the art and
accordingly is not set forth herein in detail.
FIG. 6 illustrates the
placement of the activity monitor/transducer position around the animals' neck
via a chain. In this position, the motion sensor will detect movements of the
head and neck as well as body movements of sufficient magnitude to swing the
activity monitor and, therefore, cause movement of the lead hammer 34. It is
apparent that the activity monitor/transducer could be mounted at other
positions on the animal or, implanted.
Conventionally, the activity
monitor/transducer would be interrogated twice daily at approximately
twelve-hour intervals as the cows enter the milking parlor. Given this
repetitive interrogation, accurate data from the counter 86 is provided
indicative of activity during the preceding twelve hour period.
To
characterize the estrus detection performance of the activity monitor, a number
of non-pregnant cows were outfitted with neck-mounted activity monitors as
illustrated herein. The cows were housed in free stall barns in groups of either
10 or 20 cows per pen. The cows remained in their respective pens for all daily
activities with the exception of milking. Milking occurred twice daily at
approximately 1:30AM and 1:30PM. The cows used in the study ranged from 1.sup.st
to 5.sup.th lactation. The number of days from parturition to the monitored
estrus period ranged from 33 to 300 days.
The activity monitors were
coupled to the Identification Systems as discussed herein in FIGS. 1-2 as
disclosed in the co-pending application. The activity monitors were
automatically `read` twice daily as the cows entered the milking parlor. The
respective readings were stored in the Random Access Memory of a Kim-1
Microcomputer Module manufactured by MOS Technology, Inc.
Milk samples
were collected for each cow at 2 or 3 day intervals. The milk samples were
analyzed for progesterone using a solid-phase radioimmunoassay. The milk
progesterone levels serve as the standard for determining periods of estrus.
The activity level profiles for the respective cows were individually
plotted and combined in FIG. 7. This Figure is the average activity profile for
the ten free stall cows for a 2 day pre-estrus and a 2-day post-estrus interval.
An increase in activity level was confirmed to be an indication of estrus when
it coincided with a low progesterone level (1 ng/ml). For the activity profiles
of cows that did not have milk samples taken (3 cows), an increase in activity
level was confirmed to be an indication of estrus when it coincided with
behavorial signs of estrus (i.e., standing and/or riding). For the individual
plots, the activity levels were normalized so that the non-estrus baselines
(means=X) are equal to 1. The non-estrus baselines were calculated by averaging
the activity levels over the respective number of readings, excluding the estrus
period activity level.
The performance of the activity monitor as a
predictor of estrus for the ten free stall cows is given in the following table.
For the table, the mean and standard deviation were calculated for each
consecutive reading and compared to the next reading. For example, the mean and
standard deviation are first calculated for readings 1 and 2 and compared to
reading 3. This is followed by calculations for readings 1, 2, and 3 and a
comparison to reading 4. This process continues up to the respective estrus
activity level reading.
The heat detection rates range from 10% to 90%
and the accuracies range from 28% to 100% for the six criteria examined. Of the
six criteria, the 2x Mean criteria results in the highest combined heat
detection rate (70%) and accuracy (88%). The criteria of Mean+3SD also has
reasonable results with a 70% accuracy and a 70% heat detection rate.
______________________________________
Activity as a Predictor
Heat
Readings > Readings > Det.
Criteria Criteria at Estrus Rate Accuracy
______________________________________
Mean + 1 SD
32 9 90% 28%
Mean + 2 SD
16 7 70% 44%
Mean + 3 SD
10 7 70% 70%
2 .times. Mean
8 7 70% 88%
2 .times. Mean
3 3 30% 100%
4 .times. Mean
1 1 10% 100%
______________________________________
The results, although limited in quantity, indicate that the
activity monitor can be used for estrus detection. For the ten cows examined
using the pre-estrus and post-estrus data, the heat detection rate is 70% with a
100% accuracy using a criteria that an activity level of 3 standard deviations
greater than the baseline mean corresponds to an estrus period. For the analysis
using only the pre-estrus data, the heat detection rate is 70% with an 88%
accuracy using a criteria of 2X the baseline mean.
While this invention
has been disclosed relative to its preferred embodiment, it is apparent that a
number of modifications may be practiced without departing from the scope of
this invention. For example, the motion sensor may be of an alternative design
mounted, for example, on the leg of the animal.
Additionally, as
disclosed herein, the activity monitor is self-powered by means of the
piezoelectric transducer. With contemporary circuitry such as complementary
metal-oxide semiconductor integrated circuit devices (CMOS), circuits can be
designed in the extremely low static power requirements. Consequently, once
mechanical energy of the activity monitor is converted into electrical energy to
continuously power a circuit, elements other than activity for estrus detection
are possible.
While the binary counter 86 is coupled directly to the
buffer 84, as shown in FIG. 4, other "read" devices could be employed. The
counter, for example, could be hard wired directly to a microprocessor or
display circuit on the activity monitor. The counter could be interfaced to both
passive and active transponders or, interfaced to a transponder without the
correlary identification function.
Finally, while the invention has been
described relative to the use of a single piezoelectric transducer, it is
apparent that multiple transducers could be employed either in a backup capacity
or utilizing one as the motion sensor per se and a second for purposes of
electrical powered generation.
* * * * *
![[Image]](United States Patent 4,618,861.files/image.gif)
![[Add to Shopping Cart]](United States Patent 4,618,861.files/order.gif)
